AI Judgment Quiz
Get your AI judgment profile
Most professionals fall into one of four types when it comes to AI at work (including those who decline to use it at all). Your AI judgment type has less to do with how often you use AI but rather with how you evaluate and govern AI outputs.
Understand your AI judgment profile
Everyone falls into one of four distinct categories based on how they evaluate, edit, and manage machine-generated text. Take our quiz to get your type.
The Optimistic Adopter
The Careful Reviewer
The Strategic Architect
The Principled Abstainer
You move fast, trust the tools, and get things done.
You're an early, enthusiastic adopter. You see the efficiency clearly and use AI productively. Most of the time, the output is good enough. The opportunity is building review habits for the moments when "good enough" isn't: high-stakes or public-facing content, anything where a wrong fact or off tone could cost you credibility. Adding review methods will make your speed safer.
You review carefully on your own. The next steps are consistency and scale.
You don't trust AI blindly. You read what it produces, catch what's off, and your work mostly holds up through instinct or your own informal checks. That puts you ahead of most people using these tools. The limit is that it lives in your head. What you catch depends on how alert you are that day, it doesn't transfer to anyone else, and quality drops the moment something skips past you. The next steps: make your reviewing consistent enough to hold on your worst day and coordinate with your team.
You're already thinking at the governance level. You may need a framework.
You see AI content as an organizational risk and opportunity, not just a writing task. You're asking the right questions about policy, disclosure, review systems, and team capability, but you may be the only person in your organization doing so. You need a rigorous, defensible framework to structure governance, a vocabulary for conversations with leadership, and an outside expert to pressure-test what you've built.
You've drawn a line at AI. You still may want to know how others are using it.
You don't use AI for your work writing, and you may be concerned about quality, originality, or ethics. That's a legitimate and increasingly defensible position. The thing worth examining is whether you could name the rare case where careful, checked use would be fine. A reflexive avoider just says no to all of it, and may be missing genuinely safe uses. You may need to understand how colleagues are using AI and help develop policies for its use.
Better AI Training
Our webinars and custom AI training for teams and individuals can help you develop better editorial and operational skills.